Home

Search
select medium:

search for:

Advanced Search

Participate

login
set preferences and edit your own posts

announce events
add to the radicalendar

info library
how to use this site
contact info
mailing lists
meetings
mission statement
supporting the imc


Media Centers
www.indymedia.org

africa
ambazonia
nigeria
south africa

canada
alberta
hamilton
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor

europe
athens
austria
barcelona
belgium
bristol
cyprus
euskal herria
finland
germany
ireland
italy
madrid
netherlands
nice
norway
poland
portugal
prague
russia
sweden
switzerland
thessaloniki
united kingdom

latin america
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
qollasuyu
rosario
tijuana
uruguay

pacific
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
jakarta
melbourne
sydney

south asia
india
mumbai

united states
arizona
atlanta
austin
baltimore
boston
buffalo
central florida
chicago
danbury, ct
dc
eugene
hawaii
houston
idaho
ithaca
la
madison
maine
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new jersey
new mexico
north carolina
ny capital
nyc
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rocky mountain
san diego
san francisco bay area
santa cruz, ca
seattle
st louis
tallahassee-red hills
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass

west asia
israel
palestine

[process]
discussion
fbi/legal updates
indymedia faq
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
volunteer

[projects]
climate
print
radio
satellite tv
video

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software
Kansas City IMC    Help us take back the media! Next kcindymedia meeting: Wednesday February 11, 7 PM @ Planet Sub, 4936 Main
home | features | newswire | media gallery | the otherpress | picturebooks | calendar | links | info |
link to the other press | post an article | upload media |
Add a new Article | Comment on this article | Email this Article | Printable version |
 
Commentary: Elections & Legislation
Does party affiliation really matter?
Is it the President or the ongoing policies?
Bush is now saying that he is only following the foriegn policy set by Clinton in going after terrorists. There may be some truth in that . . .

If the coporations like oil, energy, defense, media and utilities use lobbyists to influence and in some cases help write legislation, does it really matter which party or who sits in the White House? If the USA policy is to support these industries, govt policy is going to reflect that. The Repubs may just be more overt about it. What was once covert, like toppling dictators that did not give the USA access to markets and natural resources, is now quite out in the open. I always remind people that GATT and NAFTA came in under the Clinton administration.

Present oil reserves are predicted to run out in the year 2025. This was published in 1993, before the explosion of SUV's in the consumer market. So if present oil reserves are threatened, does it really matter who is President? Somebody is going to have to go out there and get us some more oil to drive to the protest rally! I don't doubt for one minite that Lieberman would have any different foreign policy than Bush does.

If someone like Nader or Kucinich were to become president, would they stand a chance of getting anything through Congress? Most agency appointees are industry insiders. I also think that Dick Grasso stepping down as head of the SEC had very little to do with his salary and much more to do with throwing the public a bone so that we would not question who was on the SEC board -- Martha Stewart was an SEC board member!

You have to ask "Who Gets Paid?" whenever you see a policy announced. Three-year work permits for immigrants? You are usually eligible for vested benefits until 3 - 5 years in some companies. So the big business owners profit. Its not about getting the Latino vote. Sanctity of marriage? A married couple with children are bigger consumers. Put a man on Mars? Is it true that space exploration is to look for minerals on other planets and that Haliburton looks to get the drilling rights? Its never about voters, but they want YOU to think so. Its about WHO GETS PAID!

I am trying real hard not to believe that voting is merely an exercise in civic entertainment just to make people think that they have some say in the process. Once you vote someone into office, they set about pushing policies that favor their campaign contributors: the people who actually own things. B/c if they don't get what they want, well then . . . everybody will be out of a job!


Add a quick comment

Your name
Your email Validate email (Strongly encouraged)
Title

Comment

Text Format
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.