info library how to use this site
contact info
mailing lists
meetings
mission statement
supporting the imc
www.indymedia.org
africa
ambazonia
nigeria
south africa
canada
alberta
hamilton
maritimes
montreal
ontario
ottawa
quebec
thunder bay
vancouver
victoria
windsor
europe
athens
austria
barcelona
belgium
bristol
cyprus
euskal herria
finland
germany
ireland
italy
madrid
netherlands
nice
norway
poland
portugal
prague
russia
sweden
switzerland
thessaloniki
united kingdom
latin america
argentina
bolivia
brasil
chiapas
chile
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
qollasuyu
rosario
tijuana
uruguay
pacific
adelaide
aotearoa
brisbane
jakarta
melbourne
sydney
south asia
india
mumbai
united states
arizona
atlanta
austin
baltimore
boston
buffalo
central florida
chicago
danbury, ct
dc
eugene
hawaii
houston
idaho
ithaca
la
madison
maine
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new jersey
new mexico
north carolina
ny capital
nyc
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rocky mountain
san diego
san francisco bay area
santa cruz, ca
seattle
st louis
tallahassee-red hills
urbana-champaign
utah
vermont
western mass
National media watchdog groups, flush with their success in stalling consolidation-friendly media ownership rules, are contemplating trying to block some TV and radio stations across the country from renewing their broadcast licenses.
Published on Saturday, October 4, 2003 by The News & Observer (Raleigh, North Carolina)
Media Activists Feeling Feisty
Might Try to Block License Renewals
by David Ranii
National media watchdog groups, flush with their success in stalling consolidation-friendly media ownership rules, are contemplating trying to block some TV and radio stations across the country from renewing their broadcast licenses.
And a new initiative by FCC Commissioner Michael Copps to conduct a series of hearings across the country -- including, most likely, one in North Carolina this fall -- could play into their plans.
Copps said the meetings will give citizens a forum to express opinions on whether broadcasters are serving the public interest, as required , and therefore deserve to have their licenses renewed.
Media groups believe the hearings could trigger challenges to some license renewals at the grass-roots level.
"You can be sure that the Copps hearings will spur local activists," said Josh Silver, managing director of Free Press, a public interest group in Massachusetts. "Stay tuned. It is going to happen."
A hearing in North Carolina would be timely, as the licenses of the state's radio stations expire Dec. 1. The licenses of TV stations in the state expire Dec. 1, 2004.
In a telephone interview, Copps said the hearings would enable the public to convey their frustrations, but added, "I'm not just interested in a pleasant conversation on localism. I'm looking to compile a record that could be used now in license renewal."
A potential local target is WDCG-FM G105, one of five Triangle stations owned by Clear Channel Communications of San Antonio, Texas. The station has come under attack from listeners and advertisers this week after Bob Dumas of the "Bob and Madison Show" said he hated seeing bicycle riders on the road and laughed at stories about motorists running cyclists down.
"If I could be of any use at any FCC hearings, I would certainly be happy to participate," said Blanche E. Dean of Durham, captain of a local cycling team called the Msfits. "[G105's] license is up for renewal Dec. 1. We would like to see that not happen."
Although Copps wants to have a hearing in North Carolina, one here is not definite, as he is trying to have all five Federal Communications Commissioners participate.
However, if the hearings aren't endorsed by all of the commissioners, Copps would be willing to go it alone. He and fellow Democrat Jonathan Adelstein conducted hearings earlier this year -- including one at Duke University in March -- that stoked opposition against the FCC's relaxed media-ownership rules. Those rules, passed by a 3-to-2 vote on June 2, have been stymied by court challenges and efforts in Congress to overturn them.
Clear Channel isn't under attack only in North Carolina.
Essential Information, a public interest group founded by Ralph Nader, recently filed a challenge to Clear Channel's radio licenses in the District of Columbia and three states. The challenge accuses the chain of running deceptive promotions and airing obscene and indecent material.
Jim Donahue, project director for Essential Information, said there are no plans to include Clear Channel's stations in North Carolina and elsewhere in the challenge -- because it's not necessary. "If the FCC did rule in our favor, they would have to revoke all of Clear Channel's licenses," he said.
Andy Levin, senior vice president of government affairs for Clear Channel, said that won't happen.
"I expect the FCC will look at the totality of the circumstances, how our stations are run in the public interest, and renew each one of our stations," he said.
The FCC reviews a station's performance, including whether it is serving the public interest, when licenses come up for renewal. But over the past two decades the agency's oversight has relaxed, and renewals are mostly rubber-stamped. They're known in the industry as "postcard renewals."
Critics complain that as the broadcast industry has consolidated, commitment to the public interest has fallen by the wayside. But Clear Channel's Levin questioned the need for hearings.
"I'm not sure going around the country and having these hearings on the taxpayer's nickel is the best way of going about it," he said.
Activists in the Kansas City area might want to consider a campaign to challenge the licenses of local corporate media stations. A successful campaign would get more progressive voices on the airwaves.